Changes

265 bytes added ,  02:22, January 12, 2009
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1: −
The '''seduction of Eve''' is seen as sexual by two religious movements: [[Christian Identity]] in the US and the [[Unification Church]], which orginated in Korea.
+
The '''seduction of Eve''' is seen as sexual by two religious movements: [[Christian Identity]] in the U.S. and the [[Unification Church]], which originated in Korea.
    
Some Bible interpreters regard Genesis as suggesting that angels had sex with earthly women:
 
Some Bible interpreters regard Genesis as suggesting that angels had sex with earthly women:
Line 10: Line 10:     
*And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day.  
 
*And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day.  
−
*Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to [[fornication]], and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire. ([http://kingjbible.com/jude/1.htm King James Version])
+
*Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire. ([http://kingjbible.com/jude/1.htm King James Version])
   −
These views are considered unorthodox within mainstream Christian thought.
+
These views are considered unorthodox within mainstream Christian thought. The points at issue are:
 +
#Can angels sin? Have any angels ever sinned?
 +
#How can an angel have sexual congress with an earthly woman?
 +
#Would this relationship result in pregnancy?
 +
#Does this have anything to do with the [[fall of man]]?
 +
 
 +
[[Category:Book of Genesis]]
21

edits