Siteadmin, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, Administrators
2,155
edits
Changes
mLine 1:
Line 1: + + + + + +
no edit summary
This place is '''''NOT''''' a 'hate site aimed at Liberals and Gays.'[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:HelpJazz#I_can_never_get_my_head_around_it] There are plenty of Liberal users on the site. If you are only here to smear this site, then leave...there are plenty of people who want to be on this site. We are not in desperate need of ''sarcastic''[http://www.conservapedia.com/User:McCain08] editors. [[User:BethanyS|~BCS]]<sup>[[User talk:BethanyS|Talk2'''ME''']]</sup> 13:43, 17 March 2008 (EDT)
This place is '''''NOT''''' a 'hate site aimed at Liberals and Gays.'[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:HelpJazz#I_can_never_get_my_head_around_it] There are plenty of Liberal users on the site. If you are only here to smear this site, then leave...there are plenty of people who want to be on this site. We are not in desperate need of ''sarcastic''[http://www.conservapedia.com/User:McCain08] editors. [[User:BethanyS|~BCS]]<sup>[[User talk:BethanyS|Talk2'''ME''']]</sup> 13:43, 17 March 2008 (EDT)
Do you read the 'Liberal ______' articles? I've never seen anything like it in my life. It seems that run of the mill articles like 'Soap' will never get searched on conservapedia. People will always go to wikipedia for that. What conservapedia does to get attention is make ridiculous unsourced statements in an article and somehow piece a concurrent line of thought throughout. I've even seen articles that just consist of a quote. Its remarkable! [[User:McCain08|McCain08]] 13:46, 17 March 2008 (EDT)
Do you read the 'Liberal ______' articles? I've never seen anything like it in my life. It seems that run of the mill articles like 'Soap' will never get searched on conservapedia. People will always go to wikipedia for that. What conservapedia does to get attention is make ridiculous unsourced statements in an article and somehow piece a concurrent line of thought throughout. I've even seen articles that just consist of a quote. Its remarkable! [[User:McCain08|McCain08]] 13:46, 17 March 2008 (EDT)
::Reference please, Mcain08, for the article only consisting of quotes?? Wikipedia's articles are long and wordy. When I even '''''TRY''''' to use them, I have to sift through so much garbage to get ''real'' information it is not even funny. I don't see why you bother coming on this site - excpet to make it look bad with your ''unsourced'' smears. Please consider leaving if you don't want to contribute '''''educational'''''material to this site. [[User:BethanyS|~BCS]]<sup>[[User talk:BethanyS|Talk2'''ME''']]</sup> 13:57, 17 March 2008 (EDT)
:Bethany, liberals here are subject to almost constant intimidation, ridicule, and arbitrary blocks. Face up to it.-[[User:PhoenixWright|PhoenixWright]] 13:49, 17 March 2008 (EDT)
:Bethany, liberals here are subject to almost constant intimidation, ridicule, and arbitrary blocks. Face up to it.-[[User:PhoenixWright|PhoenixWright]] 13:49, 17 March 2008 (EDT)
I wonder why...most liberal in the past have only tried to make CONSERVapedia look bad.[[User:BethanyS|~BCS]]<sup>[[User talk:BethanyS|Talk2'''ME''']]</sup> 13:57, 17 March 2008 (EDT)