| Line 169: |
Line 169: |
| | | | |
| | :As for the LDS, I think this has been thrashed out, unsuccessfully, several times at CP. See [http://www.irr.org/mit/Is-Mormonism-Christian.html here]. Again, the doctrine renders them ''non''-Christian. [[Image:User Fox.png|10px]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] <small>([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])</small> 08:01, 18 March 2008 (EDT) | | :As for the LDS, I think this has been thrashed out, unsuccessfully, several times at CP. See [http://www.irr.org/mit/Is-Mormonism-Christian.html here]. Again, the doctrine renders them ''non''-Christian. [[Image:User Fox.png|10px]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] <small>([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])</small> 08:01, 18 March 2008 (EDT) |
| | + | |
| | + | I should probably write an article on [[Unification Church doctrine]], but here's a quick summary based on the points above: |
| | + | #yes, [[Jesus]]'s purpose was to marry and to produce perfect children but He was killed before He could fulfill that |
| | + | #*The UC teaches that Jesus did not come to die; that he had authority to forgive sins even while he was alive |
| | + | #yes, a "third Adam" must come to fulfill G-d's plan for physical salvation by marrying |
| | + | #*but he and his wife alone will not produce the sinless race; the people alive on the earth need to be "grafted" into the [[heavenly lineage]] |
| | + | #yes, he was the offspring of [[Zechariah]] and [[Mary]] |
| | + | #*this parallels the story of [[Judah]] and [[Tamar]]; see "[[restoration of the lineage]]" |
| | + | #yes, Rev. Moon is the "[[third Adam]]" |
| | + | #*The first [[Adam]] was not supposed to fall; Jesus came as the [[second Adam]] |
| | + | #*And so it is written, “The first man Adam became a living being.”[a] The last Adam became a life-giving spirit. - 1 Corinthians 15:45 (New King James Version) |
| | + | #*Because he was executed by the Romans before he could complete his mission, he must "come again". In UC doctrine, the [[second coming]] will be fulfilled by another man, "[[third Adam]]" |
| | + | #No, UC doctrine does not deny the divinity of Jesus, although it does declare that Jesus is a human being; see [[Unification Church doctrine#The Trinity]] |
| | + | |
| | + | None of these revisions to the ''Unification Church - Christian or Cult?'' paraphrase really changes the essential point, which is that mainstream Christianity has rejected the Unification Church due to these doctrinal differences. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 08:52, 18 March 2008 (EDT) |