Changes

Matthew 27:52, 1 Kings 17:17-22, 2 Kings 4:32-35, and 2 Kings 13:21 would seem to disagree with this, in a fairly major way. How would everyone feel about finding a better way of phrasing this, in order to convey the sense that Jesus was the first to be resurrected after death had been conquered (which is a little redundant, given that the event of conquering death '''is''' the resurrection)?  

Matthew 27:52, 1 Kings 17:17-22, 2 Kings 4:32-35, and 2 Kings 13:21 would seem to disagree with this, in a fairly major way. How would everyone feel about finding a better way of phrasing this, in order to convey the sense that Jesus was the first to be resurrected after death had been conquered (which is a little redundant, given that the event of conquering death '''is''' the resurrection)?  

--[[User:Wikinterpreter|'''<font color="#000088">wi<font color="#220066">ki<font color="#550044">nt<font color="#770022">e<font color="#aa0000">r</font>p</font>r</font>et</font>er</font>''']] ^{[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Wikinterpreter woo!]}

--[[User:Wikinterpreter|'''<font color="#000088">wi<font color="#220066">ki<font color="#550044">nt<font color="#770022">e<font color="#aa0000">r</font>p</font>r</font>et</font>er</font>''']] ^{[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Wikinterpreter woo!]}