Changes

4 bytes added ,  23:14, March 26, 2008
Whatever. I'm not gonna touch this one.
Line 1: Line 1:  
[[Image:Roddy 2.jpg|thumb|100px|right|[[Roddy Bullock, JD, BSME, Executive Director Intelligent Design Network of Ohio]]]]
 
[[Image:Roddy 2.jpg|thumb|100px|right|[[Roddy Bullock, JD, BSME, Executive Director Intelligent Design Network of Ohio]]]]
−
Approached objectively, one finds that the evidence used to support Darwinism is actually better evidence for intelligent design.  One way to illustrate the concept of objectivity is to use the '''Evidence Filter'''<ref>http://idnetohio.cinti.net/pages/evidence-filter.php</ref> developed by [[Roddy Bullock]] of the [[Intelligent Design Network]]<ref>http://www.idnetohio.com</ref> (altered slightly below with permission).  Here is a brief development of objective analysis:
+
Approached objectively, one finds that the evidence used to support Darwinism is actually better evidence for [[intelligent design]].  One way to illustrate the concept of objectivity is to use the '''Evidence Filter'''<ref>http://idnetohio.cinti.net/pages/evidence-filter.php</ref> developed by [[Roddy Bullock]] of the [[Intelligent Design Network]]<ref>http://www.idnetohio.com</ref> (altered slightly below with permission).  Here is a brief development of objective analysis:
    
For each instance of observed evidence of design in nature, consider the following questions:
 
For each instance of observed evidence of design in nature, consider the following questions:
2,851

edits