Changes

Line 223: Line 223:  
Fallacies of ambiguity are fallacies which arise from ambiguity in language used.
 
Fallacies of ambiguity are fallacies which arise from ambiguity in language used.
   −
===Equivocation===
+
===Amphiboli===
 +
Amphiboli is an ambiguity which arises though loos or awkward phrasing:
   −
===Amphiboli===
+
For example: "Save soap and waste paper".
    
===Composition===
 
===Composition===
 +
The fallacy of composition occurs when the parts of a whole are incorrectly used to describe the whole.
 +
 +
For example: "Since one of the battleships is ready to deploy, the whole fleet is ready to deploy".
 +
 +
===Conflation===
 +
:''Main article: [[Conflation]]''
 +
 +
Conflation is the treatment of two different concepts as one.
 +
 +
For example: "Comparing apples to oranges".
    
===Division===
 
===Division===
 +
The fallacy of division occurs when it is argued that what is true for the whole must be true for its parts.
 +
 +
For example: "That company is very important. Since Joe works at that company, he must be very important."
 +
 +
===Equivocation===
 +
Equivocation is the use of word with multiple meanings, and then use a different meaning in the conlcusion than in the premise.
   −
===Conflation===
+
For example: "The coach said we should eat light, so take your heavy coat off."
−
[[Conflation]] is the treatment of two different concepts as one. The most common form of conflation informs the proverbial accusation, "You are comparing apples to oranges."
      
==Catalog of Logical Fallacies==
 
==Catalog of Logical Fallacies==
5,580

edits