Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
1,753 bytes added ,  03:19, March 30, 2008
Reply
Line 201: Line 201:  
*''believe that "it takes a village to raise a child" and deny the exclusive role played by [[parents]] in raising children.''  
 
*''believe that "it takes a village to raise a child" and deny the exclusive role played by [[parents]] in raising children.''  
 
[[User:Feebasfactor|Feebasfactor]] 23:16, 29 March 2008 (EDT)
 
[[User:Feebasfactor|Feebasfactor]] 23:16, 29 March 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
:Thankyou for your reply.
 +
:#The thesis of the book is that it takes a village as well as the parents to raise a child, at the moment the entry reads that it takes a village rather than the parents, so yes the exclusivity of the role is denied, but not the role itself (by memory the book states that parents have a significant and unique role to play). I did have alternate language in my original edit: ''believe that a "village" (i.e., others) should assist parents in raising children'' or something along those lines that clarifies that the position taken by the book is not to replace the parents - edit conflict, not adjusted for Feebasfactor's comment
 +
:#There may be some confusion between role reversal and the destruction of roles. Role reversal in your example would be men baking cookies and women being expected not to bake cookies, and women taking traditionally male jobs with men being expected not to take those jobs. By the destruction of roles it is expected that both men and women have an equal right to bake cookies, and that both men and women have an equal right to take whatever job they want to, I believe the latter is closer to the desire of mainstream feminists to have equal roles and to breakdown the concept of gender, rather than pushing for a matriarchal society.
 +
:#I'm not entirely happy that a one line quote from a blog in response to another article can be used to represent mainstream feminism, but it's your encyclopedia
 +
::::#There are quotes from a fictional character, I don't see why these should be in the article (using the same logic someone could use quotes from a fictional American president in a book to criticise America).
 +
:Hope this clears it up. [[User:TheGySom|TheGySom]] 23:19, 29 March 2008 (EDT)
333

edits

Navigation menu