Changes

Line 672: Line 672:  
::::TK, you probably shouldn't be indulging in personal remarks of that quality, which go against the Conservapedia Guidelines ("You must be civil. No bullying.")  Your shirt is still the right color, though, so maybe you'll be okay.  Just thought I'd let you know.--[[User:TomMoore|TomMoore]] 22:40, 10 April 2008 (EDT)
 
::::TK, you probably shouldn't be indulging in personal remarks of that quality, which go against the Conservapedia Guidelines ("You must be civil. No bullying.")  Your shirt is still the right color, though, so maybe you'll be okay.  Just thought I'd let you know.--[[User:TomMoore|TomMoore]] 22:40, 10 April 2008 (EDT)
 
:::::Guys, this is silly.  Lets end it.  And he is right, this is an encyclopedia, not a debate site.  [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 22:46, 10 April 2008 (EDT)
 
:::::Guys, this is silly.  Lets end it.  And he is right, this is an encyclopedia, not a debate site.  [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 22:46, 10 April 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
1) I'm not a liberal
 +
2) I understand that this encyclopedia is supposed to have a conservative bias, but it has degenerated into a "how liberals are ruining America" encyclopedia. I really like the idea of an encyclopedia that tries to present things from a conservative view, but this site is just embarassing to the conservative cause and unrealistic (like "[[Conservatives]] don't categorize people by race", when reality says otherwise). There is a big difference between a conservative point of view and a conservative version of reality. If I deserved to be banned for fighting against the lies that make conservapedia unreliable, then ban me. [[User:FernoKlump|FernoKlump]] 23:09, 10 April 2008 (EDT)
1,645

edits