110
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 11:
Line 11: + + +
→Advice to prevent you from being blocked
::I allso visited the site not to be named, and i have to say, im bit puzzled. Yes, it's critical towards CP but does completely censoring it and not even allowing naming the site really do any good for CP? Conservapedia is extremely critical towards Wikipedia, does Wikipedia censor CP and filter it's name? No, they even have an article about CP. If anything, this censoring only makes me thing that they might be right about this site. [[User:Adamy|Adamy]] 20:41, 13 April 2008 (EDT)
::I allso visited the site not to be named, and i have to say, im bit puzzled. Yes, it's critical towards CP but does completely censoring it and not even allowing naming the site really do any good for CP? Conservapedia is extremely critical towards Wikipedia, does Wikipedia censor CP and filter it's name? No, they even have an article about CP. If anything, this censoring only makes me thing that they might be right about this site. [[User:Adamy|Adamy]] 20:41, 13 April 2008 (EDT)
:Regarding your change of my headline: Threats and intimidation, no matter how subtle, rarely work out on a volunteer-based community project.
:I begin to feel less and less welcome here after just asking two questions about things that were in plain sight: Conservative's dedicated shout-out and the suspiciously vague "St. John's" news item. Next time I see something odd, I better just keep my mouth shut, huh? --[[User:MilesM|MilesM]] 20:42, 13 April 2008 (EDT)