Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Talk:Evolution and science (view source)
Revision as of 16:06, April 17, 2008
, 16:06, April 17, 2008to Able
Ed, I just wanted to know if you were going to put supporting evidence for the claims for both sides? I will be willing to help you with this article.--[[User:Able806|Able806]] 11:12, 17 April 2008 (EDT)
Ed, I just wanted to know if you were going to put supporting evidence for the claims for both sides? I will be willing to help you with this article.--[[User:Able806|Able806]] 11:12, 17 April 2008 (EDT)
:Just to be clear: the two sides are '''not''' liberals and conservatives but "Liberal claims about evolution" and "Science itself".
:This requires careful winnowing out of real science from liberal claims about science.
:The the following things are not science;
:*A statement by a prominent, influential organization endorsing or condemning a particular theory (this is politics or PR)
:*A public announcement of a refusal to address a critique of a scientific theory, on the grounds that the author of the critique holds offensive views (e.g., is a Christian)
:I'm willing to collaborate, but only if this means working together. ;-) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 12:06, 17 April 2008 (EDT)