Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 94: Line 94:     
:::::''Darn it! You found us out. We pocket protecting, geeky scientists are actually just making up "empirical" evidence in order to manipulate society. We had it going so well until '''you''' had to stop the fun. Thanks.'' No really, Scientists are not trying to start a dictatorship. Alarmists and anti-consumerists are. --[[User:Capercorn]] <small> [[User Talk:Capercorn|Talk]] [[Special:Contributions/Capercorn|contribs]] </small> 15:03, 17 April 2008 (EDT)
 
:::::''Darn it! You found us out. We pocket protecting, geeky scientists are actually just making up "empirical" evidence in order to manipulate society. We had it going so well until '''you''' had to stop the fun. Thanks.'' No really, Scientists are not trying to start a dictatorship. Alarmists and anti-consumerists are. --[[User:Capercorn]] <small> [[User Talk:Capercorn|Talk]] [[Special:Contributions/Capercorn|contribs]] </small> 15:03, 17 April 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
::::::Since this evidently flew over a few heads let me site a recent example of how science gets hijacked. Man-made global warming that is sold as actual scientific fact. When in fact the only thing keeping it alive is the deep pockets of its benefactors. They even tried Nuremberg style rallies in order to gain supporters. Yep, I'm rolling on the floor over that one. The Kyoto Protocols didn't work so instead of it they infused massive funding to create an actual industry to market it with. Only one small problem though. Everyone isn't stupid to believe the marketing hype that doesn't face close scrutiny. No, it isn't the scientists creating the scientific dictatorship but it is rather their employers who control where the funding goes. This technique of using scientists for propaganda purposes isn't a new one. A fact that some people seem to be ignorant of too.--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 18:26, 17 April 2008 (EDT)
277

edits

Navigation menu