Changes

→‎Reviews: we don't post false claims
Line 112: Line 112:     
:::I wasn't trying to debate ID, not at all - let's not forget those words are someone else's words, not mine.  Disagree with him if you wish, but don't shoot me - the messenger.  I was simply asking that a quote of a journalist's review of the film not be removed simply because one is offended by their negative review of the film?  I think the studios wanted to rip up all the review pages when the reviews of<i>Ishtar</i> or <i>Gigli</i> came out?  Sure!  My own point is one and only one- just because you want to like a movie, doesn't mean it's going to be a <i>good</i> <b>movie</b>.  That's all - I'm staying out of the ID debate.  <i>MakeTime</i>, as [[User:TakeTwo|TakeTwo]] 21:42, 17 April 2008 (EDT)
 
:::I wasn't trying to debate ID, not at all - let's not forget those words are someone else's words, not mine.  Disagree with him if you wish, but don't shoot me - the messenger.  I was simply asking that a quote of a journalist's review of the film not be removed simply because one is offended by their negative review of the film?  I think the studios wanted to rip up all the review pages when the reviews of<i>Ishtar</i> or <i>Gigli</i> came out?  Sure!  My own point is one and only one- just because you want to like a movie, doesn't mean it's going to be a <i>good</i> <b>movie</b>.  That's all - I'm staying out of the ID debate.  <i>MakeTime</i>, as [[User:TakeTwo|TakeTwo]] 21:42, 17 April 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::: We don't post falsehoods.  If a review makes a false claim, then it would generally not be posted.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:45, 17 April 2008 (EDT)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,597

edits