Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
5 bytes added ,  15:58, April 18, 2008
See Talk
Line 43: Line 43:  
* So far, there is no objective proof of God
 
* So far, there is no objective proof of God
 
** Therefore, we do not need to interpret evidence to fit in with the "fact" of God's existence
 
** Therefore, we do not need to interpret evidence to fit in with the "fact" of God's existence
*** Thus science is done on the basis of there being no God (i.e. [[naturalism]]) (unless His existence becomes objectively proven)
+
*** Thus science is done on the basis of there being no God (unless His existence becomes objectively proven)
**** Naturalism comes ''before'' the science. The science is based on the world view.
+
**** The world view is based on the evidence, as is science.  Thus, the science comes ''before'' the world view.
    
===Comparison===
 
===Comparison===
203

edits

Navigation menu