Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 218: Line 218:     
Could any of you who have seen the movie comment on whether or not the ''Time'' review misrepresented Stein?  The article here specifically claims it does (saying ''Time'' put words into Stein's mouth, misquoting him, and indulging in character assassination), and it was the cause of much debate here on the Talk pages a few days ago.  The ''Time'' review certainly says that "[Stein...asks], for example, how something as complex as a living cell could have possibly arisen whole from the earth's primordial soup".  Is that a true representation of what Stein says?  Does he actually pose that question, or have ''Time'' deliberately misquoted him?  It would be a rather serious offense if they had, and worth contacting them about.  [[User:Billabong|Billabong]] 14:20, 19 April 2008 (EDT)
 
Could any of you who have seen the movie comment on whether or not the ''Time'' review misrepresented Stein?  The article here specifically claims it does (saying ''Time'' put words into Stein's mouth, misquoting him, and indulging in character assassination), and it was the cause of much debate here on the Talk pages a few days ago.  The ''Time'' review certainly says that "[Stein...asks], for example, how something as complex as a living cell could have possibly arisen whole from the earth's primordial soup".  Is that a true representation of what Stein says?  Does he actually pose that question, or have ''Time'' deliberately misquoted him?  It would be a rather serious offense if they had, and worth contacting them about.  [[User:Billabong|Billabong]] 14:20, 19 April 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
::I thought the movie was interesting and thought-provoking.  My wife came to the profound realization that domesticated species (in which man controls the genetics of the creatures) are in many ways inferior to wild species.  Compare the wild turkey or wild cow to the domesticated turkey and domesticated cow and you have an example of what happens when many controls the gene pool.
 +
 +
::At any rate, I think Stein did a masterful job of presenting the case but he revealed to me the fundamental question of ID as a science (rather than as a belief).  Five hundred years ago science banished spells, fairies, ghosts or anything unseen from science. This line of thinking has brought us to our present day point of understanding.  We're now ready for a paradigm shift that is just as profound as when spiritualism was separated from science. Science is ready for the skeptical inclusion of spiritualism as part of science. We've matured enough to consider the possibility that God may be in the machine.  Even the most ardent skeptic has to agree that it only makes sense to examine the possibility, because we can not prove either side with any certainty. 
 +
 +
::I highly recommend this movie and would contribute to a fund to pay for high school students to attend this move. [[User:Everwill|Everwill]] 07:05, 20 April 2008 (EDT)
    
==Biblical position==
 
==Biblical position==
767

edits

Navigation menu