Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 243: Line 243:     
::: There is nothing uncivil about my remarks.  Your phrase about the movie is so absurd that it suggested to me a lack of being a genuine review.  If you did see the movie, then I'm convinced you didn't see it with an open mind, and nothing in your "review" suggests otherwise to me.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 20:27, 20 April 2008 (EDT)
 
::: There is nothing uncivil about my remarks.  Your phrase about the movie is so absurd that it suggested to me a lack of being a genuine review.  If you did see the movie, then I'm convinced you didn't see it with an open mind, and nothing in your "review" suggests otherwise to me.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 20:27, 20 April 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
While I am aware that I have just come off a block and I also am also totally focused on making more substantial edits I still must say that, Aschlafly, your critique of the above gentlemans grammatical use is ''slightly'' childish. We are all adults here and KeithJoseph had a legitimate point.
 +
[[User:AdenJ|AdenJ]] 05:56, 21 April 2008 (EDT)
    
==ID and science==
 
==ID and science==
548

edits

Navigation menu