| | ::::::Actually, it doesn't. It is generally believed by physicists (though this is really a hypothesis, at the moment), that, at the beginning of the universe, the Big Bang, all physical laws and rules basically didn't apply. Indeed, it is commonly stated that the question, 'what came before the Big Bang?' is nonsensical, because, in the Big Bang, time, basically, did not exist (though there are a couple of hypotheses that actually challenge that). [[User:Urushnor|Urushnor]] 15:15, 21 April 2008 (EDT) | | ::::::Actually, it doesn't. It is generally believed by physicists (though this is really a hypothesis, at the moment), that, at the beginning of the universe, the Big Bang, all physical laws and rules basically didn't apply. Indeed, it is commonly stated that the question, 'what came before the Big Bang?' is nonsensical, because, in the Big Bang, time, basically, did not exist (though there are a couple of hypotheses that actually challenge that). [[User:Urushnor|Urushnor]] 15:15, 21 April 2008 (EDT) |
| − | :::::scientists have not gone back into the past to check that. [[User:Urushnor|Urushnor]] 15:15, 21 April 2008 (EDT) | + | :::::scientists have not gone back into the past to check that. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 11:46, 21 April 2008 (EDT) |
| | ::::::Mainly because the laws of physics indicate this is impossible. [[User:Urushnor|Urushnor]] 15:15, 21 April 2008 (EDT) | | ::::::Mainly because the laws of physics indicate this is impossible. [[User:Urushnor|Urushnor]] 15:15, 21 April 2008 (EDT) |
| | :::::::I believe you are making a common mistake in arguments of this sort. Please find above where Philip said there was a proof for God... Evidence and proof are not interchangeable words. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 15:48, 21 April 2008 (EDT) | | :::::::I believe you are making a common mistake in arguments of this sort. Please find above where Philip said there was a proof for God... Evidence and proof are not interchangeable words. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 15:48, 21 April 2008 (EDT) |
| | + | ::::::::Well, if there isn't clear, undeniable proof of God, that kinda destroys his whole argument that it is basically impossible for a 'weak atheist' to be an atheist due to the evidence (or, rather, lack of it), rather than an underlying world view. [[User:Urushnor|Urushnor]] 19:33, 21 April 2008 (EDT) |