Changes

653 bytes added ,  18:41, April 23, 2008
Those trying to stop this film accused its producers of fraudulence in obtaining interviews, hypocrisy, plagiarism, and copyright infringement. They have attacked the issuers of license for music used
Line 12: Line 12:     
This is all one big marketing strategy by Expelled, and it has worked spectacularly. [http://www.uncommondescent.com/legal/expelled-plagiarizing-harvard/]
 
This is all one big marketing strategy by Expelled, and it has worked spectacularly. [http://www.uncommondescent.com/legal/expelled-plagiarizing-harvard/]
 +
 +
==Response to the film as an illustration of the film's point==
 +
 +
Those trying to stop this film accused its producers of fraudulence in obtaining interviews, hypocrisy, plagiarism, and copyright infringement. They have attacked the issuers of license for music used, “informed” Harvard about the video, threatened legal action, advocated sneaking in, advocated bootlegging the film, written to try to dissuade theatres from showing it, etc. I kept having visions of roadblocks set up to inspect the tire-pressure and tail lights of the trucks transporting the film to theatres. [http://www.uncommondescent.com/legal/expelled-plagiarizing-harvard/]
Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650

edits