Changes

Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)

Revision as of 19:33, April 26, 2008

487 bytes added , 19:33, April 26, 2008

→‎Administrator names? Huh?: reply

Line 167: Line 167:

I concur. --[[User:StevenM|Steve]] 14:23, 26 April 2008 (EDT)

+

: Replying to Linus above, there is nothing contradictory about:

+

* criticizing anti-intellectual user names

+

* criticizing long-winded, wordy entries filled with trivial and weak on substance

+

: That's Wikipedia in a nutshell. It tells you everything except what you need to know, just like the National Enquirer. And Wikipedia gives that juice from the hands of anti-intellectual contributors who think it's funny to be dumb.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 15:33, 26 April 2008 (EDT)

Aschlafly

Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators

126,231

edits