Changes

He then [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Expelled:_No_Intelligence_Allowed&diff=prev&oldid=433931 removed the review], stating there was "no evidence" Stein says this - despite not having seen the movie himself.  (At this point in time, the movie had been seen by the journalist concerned, but could not have been seen by Mr.Poor as it had not yet been released).  He further accused the reviewer of [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Expelled:_No_Intelligence_Allowed&diff=next&oldid=434027 "putting words in Steins mouth"].  This unfounded opinion was [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Expelled:_No_Intelligence_Allowed&diff=next&oldid=434179 then placed in the 'encyclopedia' article].

He then [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Expelled:_No_Intelligence_Allowed&diff=prev&oldid=433931 removed the review], stating there was "no evidence" Stein says this - despite not having seen the movie himself.  (At this point in time, the movie had been seen by the journalist concerned, but could not have been seen by Mr.Poor as it had not yet been released).  He further accused the reviewer of [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Expelled:_No_Intelligence_Allowed&diff=next&oldid=434027 "putting words in Steins mouth"].  This unfounded opinion was [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Expelled:_No_Intelligence_Allowed&diff=next&oldid=434179 then placed in the 'encyclopedia' article].

A debate on the Talk page began between Ed Poor, ASchalfly and myself, where I was accused of supporting a viewpoint on Intelligent Design and/or Evolution - which was never my position, and nor did I ever proclaim an opinion on such matters.  I continued to simply argue for the review to be included.  I was repeatedly  blocked for arguing that whether or not one agreed with the review, it should remain in the the article for Fair Balance, and for pointing out that it was not me who quoted Stein, but the reviewer, who was in fact the only one of the three of us who ''could'' know what Stein says n the movie..

A debate on the Talk page began between Ed Poor[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Expelled:_No_Intelligence_Allowed&diff=434041&oldid=434034], ASchalfly[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Expelled:_No_Intelligence_Allowed&diff=434034&oldid=434032] and myself{http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Expelled:_No_Intelligence_Allowed&diff=434047&oldid=434041][http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Expelled:_No_Intelligence_Allowed&diff=434102&oldid=434078][http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Expelled:_No_Intelligence_Allowed&diff=434112&oldid=434106], where I was accused of supporting a viewpoint on Intelligent Design and/or Evolution - which was never my position, and nor did I ever proclaim an opinion on such matters.  I continued to simply argue for the review to be included.  I was repeatedly  blocked for arguing that whether or not one agreed with the review, it should remain in the the article for Fair Balance, and for pointing out that it was not me who quoted Stein, but the reviewer, who was in fact the only one of the three of us who ''could'' know what Stein says n the movie..

Finally, Ed Poor [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Expelled:_No_Intelligence_Allowed&diff=434071&oldid=434070 admitted that he had not seen the movie], and therefore was not in a position to comment on what Stein did or didn't say in the film.

Finally, Ed Poor [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Expelled:_No_Intelligence_Allowed&diff=434071&oldid=434070 admitted that he had not seen the movie], and therefore was not in a position to comment on what Stein did or didn't say in the film.