Changes

==Blocking users who post relevant information==

==Blocking users who post relevant information==

I was the various users MakeTime, TakeTwo, TakeThree, JanEngerlund and HarrietJones, all of whom are blocked.    My crime was to post a review of [[Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed]] by ''Time'' magazine.  Although an undeniably negative review of the movie, I [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Expelled:_No_Intelligence_Allowed&diff=prev&oldid=433362 posted a selection of quotes from the review] in the already existing 'Reviews' section of the ''Expelled'' article.  One would imagine  an uncontroversial addition to an article - no matter how disagreeable the opinion, which is after all what a movie review is - would be a review by the biggest-selling weekly news magazine in America.

I was the various users MakeTime, TakeTwo, TakeThree, JanEngerlund and HarrietJones, all of whom are blocked[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=block&user=&page=User%3AMakeTime][http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=block&user=&page=User%3ATakeTwo][http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=block&user=&page=User%3ATakeThree][http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=block&user=&page=User%3AJanEngerlund][http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=block&user=&page=User%3AHarrietJones].    My crime was to post a review of [[Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed]] by ''Time'' magazine.  Although an undeniably negative review of the movie, I [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Expelled:_No_Intelligence_Allowed&diff=prev&oldid=433362 posted a selection of quotes from the review] in the already existing 'Reviews' section of the ''Expelled'' article.  One would imagine  an uncontroversial addition to an article - no matter how disagreeable the opinion, which is after all what a movie review is - would be a review by the biggest-selling weekly news magazine in America.

Ed Poor took offense to this line in the review -

Ed Poor took offense to this line in the review -