Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 37: Line 37:  
That question being: if we don't cannot establish with certainty whether the life was created or whether it appeared from sheer luck, then why are we forcing one of these two choices upon our academia.  With regards to Darwinism, and in a free society, why can't some questions be asked?  
 
That question being: if we don't cannot establish with certainty whether the life was created or whether it appeared from sheer luck, then why are we forcing one of these two choices upon our academia.  With regards to Darwinism, and in a free society, why can't some questions be asked?  
   −
Just as [[Einstien]]'s [[Theory of Relativity]] obliterated and at the same time upheld [[Isaac Newton]]'s work in Physics, the film implies that there is perhaps a great deal to learn by asking questions about the origins of life while
+
Just as [[Einstien]]'s [[Theory of Relativity]] obliterated and at the same time upheld [[Isaac Newton]]'s work in Physics, the film implies that there is perhaps a great deal to learn by asking questions about the origins of life. The film shows why Darwin's work is important and in many respects valid. That said, Darwin's works should not be used as philosophical works to describe the nature of God or the origins of life.
    
==About intelligent design itself==
 
==About intelligent design itself==
767

edits

Navigation menu