Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:  
I think that Relgion is just a tool to make people fell safe and not alone in this world. However alot of its beliefs are proven wrong by modern science. Such as carbon dateing with fossils and so on. so now that we know how most of the world works there is no need for it anymore. I mean the world isnt flat right and we know the world isnt 6000 years old. So basically in this day in age we dont need an ancient book to tell us how the world works. Cuz i would like to think of myself as more inteligant then people who were alive 2000 years ago.
 
I think that Relgion is just a tool to make people fell safe and not alone in this world. However alot of its beliefs are proven wrong by modern science. Such as carbon dateing with fossils and so on. so now that we know how most of the world works there is no need for it anymore. I mean the world isnt flat right and we know the world isnt 6000 years old. So basically in this day in age we dont need an ancient book to tell us how the world works. Cuz i would like to think of myself as more inteligant then people who were alive 2000 years ago.
 +
==Yes==
 +
Religion has to be relevant in that so many people are influenced by it. 
 +
Religion is not relevant in discovering scientific truth and has only served to impede scientific understanding.
 +
Religious truth is necessarily contradictory to factual understanding as the particular notion of truth only becomes the purview of religion is unsubstantiated or contradictory to physical or natural truth otherwise it is a general truth.  Therefore the focus of conservipedia is the aspects of Christianity that focus on the discrepancies between reason and logic based on observable, quantifiable, understandable phenomenon and an interpretation of Christian text biased towards the Conservative Agenda.
103

edits

Navigation menu