Changes

:::::::::: Given that all agree that the laws of physics were different as one gets close in time to the origin universe, it is a logical absurdity to then pretend the laws have always been the same and draw conclusions based on that implausible assumption.  Those who insist on doing that are simply assuming what they are trying to prove.  They're chasing their own tail.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 12:47, 27 April 2008 (EDT)</div>

:::::::::: Given that all agree that the laws of physics were different as one gets close in time to the origin universe, it is a logical absurdity to then pretend the laws have always been the same and draw conclusions based on that implausible assumption.  Those who insist on doing that are simply assuming what they are trying to prove.  They're chasing their own tail.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 12:47, 27 April 2008 (EDT)</div>

::::::::::: But the point is that ''not all'' agree that the laws of physics were different as one get close in time to the origin of the universe.  The only people who do think that, as far as I know, are Big Bang cosmologists (and anyone who accepts what those scientists say) who accept it for the first few microseconds after the Big Bang.  God created the laws of physics as part of His creation, and being a consistent God, does not change them.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 04:09, 28 April 2008 (EDT)

::::::::::: But the point is that ''not all'' agree that the laws of physics were different as one get close in time to the origin of the universe.  The only people who do think that, as far as I know, are Big Bang cosmologists (and anyone who accepts what those scientists say) who accept it for the first few microseconds after the Big Bang.  God created the laws of physics as part of His creation, and being a consistent God, does not change them.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 04:09, 28 April 2008 (EDT)

<div style="background:#eee">

<div style="background:#eee">