Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
194 bytes added ,  16:58, April 28, 2008
no edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:  
He developed five proofs for the existence of [[God]] using logic.  The first three were "cosmological" proofs rather than the "ontological" approach of [[St. Anselm]].  A cosmological proof deals with the natural order of the universe.  Aquinas' most famous cosmological argument was that whatever is in motion (for example, us) must have been put in motion by something else (our parents).  They, in turn, must have been put in motion by something else (their parents).  But this sequence cannot go on to infinity.  There must have been a first mover.  This we call "God".   
 
He developed five proofs for the existence of [[God]] using logic.  The first three were "cosmological" proofs rather than the "ontological" approach of [[St. Anselm]].  A cosmological proof deals with the natural order of the universe.  Aquinas' most famous cosmological argument was that whatever is in motion (for example, us) must have been put in motion by something else (our parents).  They, in turn, must have been put in motion by something else (their parents).  But this sequence cannot go on to infinity.  There must have been a first mover.  This we call "God".   
   −
St. Thomas Aquinas' views on the nature of man included an incomplete interpretation of the [[Fall of Man]]. He believed that while men had rebelled against God and the human will was fallen, the human intellect remained perfect. Therefore, human wisdom could be relied upon and given as much prominence as the teachings of the [[Bible]]. This idea justified mixing the works of the classical, secular philosophers into Christian theology.  Charles Murray wrote, "Aquinas made the case, eventually adopted by the Church, that human intelligence is a gift from God, and that to apply human intelligence to understanding the world is not an affront to God but is pleasing to him." <ref>http://www.amconmag.com/11_17_03/review.html</ref>
+
Saint Thomas has a different view of the fall than Calvin or Luther. He does not view man as totaly depraved. His will is weakened and His intelect cloaded, nontheless his nature is not totaly corupted, for as created by God it is still basicly good. Nevertheless man cannot atain to salvation on his own but is in need of grace.  Though the intelect is cloaded, unasisted human reason can still atain to many of the truths about God. For instance the existance of God can be proved from the nature of the created universe. Nontheless certain things are only knowable through Divine Revelation such as the doctrine of the blessed Trinity. Because of his view of the power of the human mind though harmed by the fall,yet not totaly destroyed the works of the classical, secular philosophers could be brought into the service of Christian theology.  Charles Murray wrote, "Aquinas made the case, eventually adopted by the Church, that human intelligence is a gift from God, and that to apply human intelligence to understanding the world is not an affront to God but is pleasing to him." <ref>http://www.amconmag.com/11_17_03/review.html</ref>
   −
Also as a result, the authority of the Church became as important, if not more so, than that of the Bible.  These ideas set the stage for humanism, which was the predominant philosophy of the [[Renaissance]].
      
Concerning the nature of God, Aquinas found that the best approach, commonly called the "via negativa", is to consider what God is not. This led him to propose five positive statements about the divine qualities:
 
Concerning the nature of God, Aquinas found that the best approach, commonly called the "via negativa", is to consider what God is not. This led him to propose five positive statements about the divine qualities:
25

edits

Navigation menu