Changes

:: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 11:58, 30 April 2008 (EDT)

:: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 11:58, 30 April 2008 (EDT)

:::There, you're comparing apples with oranges.  We know that the spearheads were created by man as we can compare them with independant evidence that very similar spearheads were created by man.  In addition, we do have evidence of man in the areas surrounding the region, and there was, at the time, no barrier to man moving into that region.  In your hypothetical example, Stonehenge is fairly unique and unusual (to such an extent that we still haven't actually figured out exactly what it's for) and, in your hypothetical example, the one and only piece of evidence we actually have that man was even on the same landmass was the simple fact Stonehenge existed, so there was a barrier to man simply moving into the region - it's called the sea.  Now, if the simple existence of these spearheads were the one and only bit of evidence that we had of the existence of man at the time in the whole of the North American continent, then you would be comparing apples with apples. However, that's not true. [[User:Urushnor|Urushnor]] 16:20, 30 April 2008 (EDT)

:::There, you're comparing apples with oranges.  We know that the spearheads were created by man as we can compare them with independant evidence that very similar spearheads were created by man.  In addition, we do have evidence of man in the areas surrounding the region, and there was, at the time, no barrier to man moving into that region.  In your hypothetical example, Stonehenge is fairly unique and unusual (to such an extent that we still haven't actually figured out exactly what it's for) and, in your hypothetical example, the one and only piece of evidence we actually have that man was even on the same landmass was the simple fact Stonehenge existed, so there was a barrier to man simply moving into the region - it's called the sea.  Now, if the simple existence of these artifacts were the one and only bit of evidence that we had of the existence of man at the time in the whole of the North American continent, and these were so strange, unusual and unknown that we simply couldn't work out what they were for, then you would be comparing apples with apples. However, that's not true. [[User:Urushnor|Urushnor]] 16:20, 30 April 2008 (EDT)

:'''Example 2'''

:'''Example 2'''