Changes

In ''Hinrichs v. Speaker of the House of Representatives'', 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 25363 (7th Cir. Oct. 30, 2007), the Court of Appeals for the [[Seventh Circuit]] applied a recent 5-4 [[conservative]] decision to uphold the saying of sectarian prayers by the Indiana legislature.

In '''''Hinrichs v. Speaker of the House of Representatives''''', 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 25363 (7th Cir. Oct. 30, 2007), the Court of Appeals for the [[Seventh Circuit]] applied a recent 5-4 [[conservative]] decision to uphold the saying of sectarian prayers by the Indiana legislature.

Specifically, the [[Seventh Circuit]] denied [[standing]] and dismissed the case for lack of [[jurisdiction]] because it applied Justice [[Sam Alito]]'s opinion in ''[[Hein v. Freedom from Religion Foundation, Inc.]]'', 127 S. Ct. 2553 (2007):  "we believe that ''Hein'' requires us to revisit our preliminary determination that the [[plaintiff]]s possess the requisite [[standing]] to maintain this action."

Specifically, the [[Seventh Circuit]] denied [[standing]] and dismissed the case for lack of [[jurisdiction]] because it applied Justice [[Sam Alito]]'s opinion in ''[[Hein v. Freedom from Religion Foundation, Inc.]]'', 127 S. Ct. 2553 (2007):  "we believe that ''Hein'' requires us to revisit our preliminary determination that the [[plaintiff]]s possess the requisite [[standing]] to maintain this action."