Changes

In ''Hibbs v. Winn'', 542 U.S. 88 (2004), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] narrowly held that the [[Tax Injunction Act]] does not withdraw jurisdiction from [[federal court]]s over an [[Establishment Clause]] claim to [[Arizona]] income-tax credits for payments to organizations that award educational scholarships and tuition grants to children attending private schools.

In '''''Hibbs v. Winn''''', 542 U.S. 88 (2004), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] narrowly held that the [[Tax Injunction Act]] does not withdraw jurisdiction from [[federal court]]s over an [[Establishment Clause]] claim to [[Arizona]] income-tax credits for payments to organizations that award educational scholarships and tuition grants to children attending private schools.

Justice [[Ruth Bader Ginsburg]] wrote the opinion for the 5-4 Court.  The swing vote was provided by Justice [[Sandra Day O'Connor]] (who has since been replaced by Justice [[Sam Alito]], who is likely to rule differently):

Justice [[Ruth Bader Ginsburg]] wrote the opinion for the 5-4 Court.  The swing vote was provided by Justice [[Sandra Day O'Connor]] (who has since been replaced by Justice [[Sam Alito]], who is likely to rule differently):