Changes

Keystone Bituminous Coal Ass'n v. DeBenedictis (view source)

Revision as of 03:29, May 3, 2008

6 bytes added , 03:29, May 3, 2008

m

no edit summary

Line 1: Line 1: −

In ''Keystone Bituminous Coal Ass'n v. DeBenedictis'', 480 U.S. 470 (1987), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that that a regulation banning certain uses of a portion of an owner's property does not require compensation under the [[Fifth Amendment]] [[Takings Clause]].

+

In '''''Keystone Bituminous Coal Ass'n v. DeBenedictis''''', 480 U.S. 470 (1987), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that that a regulation banning certain uses of a portion of an owner's property does not require compensation under the [[Fifth Amendment]] [[Takings Clause]].

[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]

[[category:Fifth Amendment]]

FernoKlump

1,645

edits