Scalia wrote a dissent to the case, observing how the case really concerned the "[[homosexual agenda]]." Why is the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] picking sides in a political dispute? He reminded the Court of its narrow role in resolving social conflicts, and took a textual view of the [[Fourteenth Amendment]] as protecting only against discrimination on the basis of race and gender. Since sexual "orientation" was neither, he said, the legal inquiry was over, and the [[U.S. Constitution]] was silent. | Scalia wrote a dissent to the case, observing how the case really concerned the "[[homosexual agenda]]." Why is the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] picking sides in a political dispute? He reminded the Court of its narrow role in resolving social conflicts, and took a textual view of the [[Fourteenth Amendment]] as protecting only against discrimination on the basis of race and gender. Since sexual "orientation" was neither, he said, the legal inquiry was over, and the [[U.S. Constitution]] was silent. |