Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 413: Line 413:     
::: The evidence is most striking with female rock stars.  Estimate the size of that population (perhaps 50) and look at how many have been stricken by breast cancer at a young age.  If they were working in a coal mine and you saw the same data, would you brush it off and ignore it?  I wouldn't.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 13:53, 19 May 2008 (EDT)
 
::: The evidence is most striking with female rock stars.  Estimate the size of that population (perhaps 50) and look at how many have been stricken by breast cancer at a young age.  If they were working in a coal mine and you saw the same data, would you brush it off and ignore it?  I wouldn't.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 13:53, 19 May 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
::::Sorry. I asked for evidence, and you reply with nothing more than an assertion. I am quite prepared to believe that it might be so, but there is nothing to demonstrate whether it is or not. You present no evidence that the incidence is unusually high. How is the study population defined, and how big is it, and what is is the incidence of breast cancer? What is the control group, and how does the incidence there compare with that in the study population? And how do you control for biases such as reporting bias? It's an interesting idea, and deserves proper study, but without such a study you simply have no grounds for the assertion. [[User:Humblpi|Humblpi]] 14:02, 19 May 2008 (EDT)
333

edits

Navigation menu