nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
13,818
edits
Changes
no edit summary
It seemed like the Controversy section was detailed and referenced - why should it be replaced by a simple statement that there's controversy. Frankly, the controversy about his finances is pretty cut and dry compared to the controversy over his statements about Catholicism, and the ones about the Nazis doing God's work that have caused John McCain to disavow Hagee and his endorsement today. --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 21:52, 22 May 2008 (EDT)
It seemed like the Controversy section was detailed and referenced - why should it be replaced by a simple statement that there's controversy. Frankly, the controversy about his finances is pretty cut and dry compared to the controversy over his statements about Catholicism, and the ones about the Nazis doing God's work that have caused John McCain to disavow Hagee and his endorsement today. --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 21:52, 22 May 2008 (EDT)
:As much as possible we try to keep balance. The amount of information about John Hagee was dwarfed by the controversy section. Reading the article you would think the main aspect of John Hagee's life is controversy, and that would be misleading. What we try to have contributors do is expand the totality of the article. If the contributor knows enough that they've followed a controversy thread, then they probably know enough or know where to check up information that they could add additional content on Hagee's life, theology, accomplishments, etc. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 10:43, 23 May 2008 (EDT)