Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 457: Line 457:     
: Murray, EngelUmpocker has answered the simple question.  You have not.  Do I need to ask it again?  "Suppose a disease has an overall incidence of 1 in 1000.  Suppose next that among 50 people who worked in a particular mine, 5 came down with the disease.  Do you dismiss the data and continue sending more women into the mine?  Yes or no, please."--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 20:59, 22 May 2008 (EDT)
 
: Murray, EngelUmpocker has answered the simple question.  You have not.  Do I need to ask it again?  "Suppose a disease has an overall incidence of 1 in 1000.  Suppose next that among 50 people who worked in a particular mine, 5 came down with the disease.  Do you dismiss the data and continue sending more women into the mine?  Yes or no, please."--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 20:59, 22 May 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
Andy, are you not reading my words?  I said a 10% increase is sufficient cause for concern if it's significantly different from the population, and 5/50 vs 1/1000 is more than 10% and would be significant.  That should be clear enough.  I do note that I have not gotten an answer to my simple question:  where did 50 come from?  Why the reluctance to be transparent?  50 is obviously not correct.  You challenged someone above to name 50 touring female singers between 22 and 30.  Check my talk page for a list of 114.  Unlike your list, which includes South America and individuals diagnosed 30 years ago, I only included artists from English-speaking countries who  performed in 2007-08.  [[User:Murray|Murray]] 14:45, 24 May 2008 (EDT)
 +
 
::::The rational answer is that it depends on the disease, and the likelihood that it could be related to mining.  Based on working in close quarters, 80% of the women working in the same mine could catch the same case of chicken pox, but no one would suggest that mining causes chicken pox. --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 21:26, 22 May 2008 (EDT)
 
::::The rational answer is that it depends on the disease, and the likelihood that it could be related to mining.  Based on working in close quarters, 80% of the women working in the same mine could catch the same case of chicken pox, but no one would suggest that mining causes chicken pox. --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 21:26, 22 May 2008 (EDT)
  
953

edits

Navigation menu