Changes

→‎Pointers: Argueing over numbers is moot; would you agree?
Line 327: Line 327:     
:(a) "being named" is not specific enough; should read "being named as holding CPUSA membership", or "being named a spy".  Those are two ''entirely different'' things. (b) giving testimony is not the same as being investigated; the person giving testimony may have been subpoenaed to answer question about the activities within an institution, organization, or of other persons.  Further, the fact the person giving testimony may have held CPUSA membership, but was not themself being actively investigated, hardly qualifies them as being a victim.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 14:17, 18 March 2007 (EDT)
 
:(a) "being named" is not specific enough; should read "being named as holding CPUSA membership", or "being named a spy".  Those are two ''entirely different'' things. (b) giving testimony is not the same as being investigated; the person giving testimony may have been subpoenaed to answer question about the activities within an institution, organization, or of other persons.  Further, the fact the person giving testimony may have held CPUSA membership, but was not themself being actively investigated, hardly qualifies them as being a victim.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 14:17, 18 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
:(c) Argueing over numbers, i.e. was it 205, 87, 57 etc. is moot at this point.  Would you agree?
    
==Page protection==
 
==Page protection==
Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
295,844

edits