Changes

392 bytes added ,  21:47, March 18, 2007
Line 56: Line 56:  
==Not allowed to de-Biblify the Bible!==
 
==Not allowed to de-Biblify the Bible!==
 
if you'll look at the [[Bible]] aarticle I done, you'll see the structure and layout that I would like to see for all the books of the Bible.  Basically just telling the reader what it's all about.  For Genesis, the same thing should apply, but the things that have been made controversial, such as the Creation, the Flood, etc, if we started to explain those within the article then the result would be that it would lose scope and flow.  I prefer separate articles on these subjects, where a lot of detail can be devoted to just that.  You'll see how Genesis will look when I'm done...give it under five hours!  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 19:58, 17 March 2007 (EDT)
 
if you'll look at the [[Bible]] aarticle I done, you'll see the structure and layout that I would like to see for all the books of the Bible.  Basically just telling the reader what it's all about.  For Genesis, the same thing should apply, but the things that have been made controversial, such as the Creation, the Flood, etc, if we started to explain those within the article then the result would be that it would lose scope and flow.  I prefer separate articles on these subjects, where a lot of detail can be devoted to just that.  You'll see how Genesis will look when I'm done...give it under five hours!  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 19:58, 17 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
==Creation stuff==
 +
I looked at what you had placed in from Genesis, and I had seen something recently (I can't remember when) in which someone took each line from Genesis 1 and added some relevant material which explained the science/evidence supporting that particular verse.  I think the same thing should be added here.  What say you?  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 17:47, 18 March 2007 (EDT)
Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, Moderators, move, protect, rollback, Administrators
27,336

edits