Changes

Talk:Kitzmiller vs. Dover Area School District (view source)

Revision as of 15:23, June 2, 2008

521 bytes added , 15:23, June 2, 2008

reply to Philip

Line 177: Line 177:

[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:48, 2 June 2008 (EDT)

+

: Philip, this case is a 2-million dollar verdict that completely censored any mention of ID. That needs to come across clearly early in the entry. The money awarded obviously increases the motivation for this ACLU-type case.

+

: A reader should be able, based on the first 100 or so words, to understand the significance of the outcome of the case. I don't mind fluff later in the entry, but it should not obscure the essence that needs to be on the first page.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 11:23, 2 June 2008 (EDT)

Aschlafly

Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators

126,506

edits