Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
1,253
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 6:
Line 6: + +
Debate:Should the federal government have the power to define marriage? (view source)
Revision as of 21:34, June 5, 2008
, 21:34, June 5, 2008→YES
Yes. Due to the many tangible benifits a marriage license brings (tax credits, inheritance, etc), the government should be able to define who gets what right. However, the government has no place telling two loving adults that their relationship is false and they cannot wed. [[User:CraigC|CraigC]] 19:22, 22 May 2008 (EDT)
Yes. Due to the many tangible benifits a marriage license brings (tax credits, inheritance, etc), the government should be able to define who gets what right. However, the government has no place telling two loving adults that their relationship is false and they cannot wed. [[User:CraigC|CraigC]] 19:22, 22 May 2008 (EDT)
:That's begging the question; those "tangible benefits" are ''examples'' of government definition/regulation of marriage. Claiming that they should have the power to define and regulate marriage because they've already defined and regulated marriage is circular logic. --[[User:Benp|Benp]] 17:34, 5 June 2008 (EDT)
==NO==
==NO==