Changes

747 bytes added ,  13:02, June 7, 2008
Line 44: Line 44:     
[[User:Xyrophile|Xyrophile]] 11:22, 5 June 2008 (EDT)
 
[[User:Xyrophile|Xyrophile]] 11:22, 5 June 2008 (EDT)
 +
:Your answers basically amount to ''faith'' that the naturalistic view will one day find evidence to support your point of view.  Yes, the fact that we don't know how it happened doesn't mean that it didn't, but the article doesn't put it that way.  It merely refers to them as "problems", not "impossibilities".  And there's a difference between trying to explain the mechanism of something that's been observed (gravity) and something that has not been observed and which people ''do'' claim never happened.  That scientists sometimes find some tiny piece of the puzzle (such as RNA acting like an enzyme in very limited ways) does not mean that the puzzle has been solved.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:02, 7 June 2008 (EDT)
nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254

edits