4,542
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: − + − Republican+
no edit summary
Should the BBC be allowed as a referring sourve if it allows this sort of [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/6464277.stm content]and [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4879672.stm this.]
Should the BBC be allowed as a referring sourve if it allows this sort of [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/6464277.stm content]and [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4879672.stm this.]{{unsigned|republican}}
:...And what do those articles have to do with it being used as a reliable source? That's news; it's reporting on studies. And it's made up of tens of thousands of people, so the whole corporation can't be blamed for one reporters articles. --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 21:29, 18 March 2007 (EDT)