Changes

Line 33: Line 33:     
::::I have to say that it seems a bit strange to me to relegate a description of the actual subject of the article to a footnote, while the entirety of the body of the article is devoted to ideological argument.  But I guess if you're willing to unilaterally overrule others and really don't see the problem, there's not much we can do.  You own this site, after all.--[[user:TomMoore|<font color="#000066" >Tom Moore</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:TomMoore|fiat justitia ruat coelum]]</sup> 12:51, 9 June 2008 (EDT)
 
::::I have to say that it seems a bit strange to me to relegate a description of the actual subject of the article to a footnote, while the entirety of the body of the article is devoted to ideological argument.  But I guess if you're willing to unilaterally overrule others and really don't see the problem, there's not much we can do.  You own this site, after all.--[[user:TomMoore|<font color="#000066" >Tom Moore</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:TomMoore|fiat justitia ruat coelum]]</sup> 12:51, 9 June 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::::The primary job of an encyclopedia is to explain ''what'' something is, not the current political situation surrounding it.  while all that information is necessary, it should come second to a clear explanation of the subject.  --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] <small>(CPAdmin1)</small><sup>[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]</sup>  <sup>[[User:CPAdmin1/Polls|Vote in my NEW polls]]</sup> 23:00, 9 June 2008 (EDT)
Siteadmin, Upload, Automoderated users, edit
2,144

edits