Changes

The biggest weakness of the [[documentary]] is Moore's one-sided analysis. He emphasizes the bad points of American health care and the good points of the alternatives. His portrayal of health care in Cuba is a complete whitewash.  

The biggest weakness of the [[documentary]] is Moore's one-sided analysis. He emphasizes the bad points of American health care and the good points of the alternatives. His portrayal of health care in Cuba is a complete whitewash.  

The film also inaccurately portrays the British National Health Service (NHS) as free; in fact NHS policies vary between the four constituent countries of the UK. Drug prescriptions, eye tests and dental charges have to be paid in most cases, on top of the income tax and National Insurance funding. Most British citizens believe that the NHS offers care of a poor quality.^{[Citation needed]}

The film also inaccurately portrays the British National Health Service (NHS) as free; in fact NHS policies vary between the four constituent countries of the UK. Drug prescriptions, eye tests and dental charges have to be paid in most cases, on top of the income tax and National Insurance funding.  

 

The film has generated some controversy for a sequence in which Moore brings a group of patients to [[Cuba]], which may have violated the American embargo of that country. The film is designed to have a political impact, but both [[Republican]] and [[Democratic]] politicians have distanced themselves from it.<ref>http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-movie22jun22,0,5962985.story?coll=la-home-center</ref>   

The film has generated some controversy for a sequence in which Moore brings a group of patients to [[Cuba]], which may have violated the American embargo of that country. The film is designed to have a political impact, but both [[Republican]] and [[Democratic]] politicians have distanced themselves from it.<ref>http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-movie22jun22,0,5962985.story?coll=la-home-center</ref>