Changes

Line 241: Line 241:  
::Looks like a good start, Tom, but from the comments so far it seems like nothing short of the full set of observations is going to be satisfactory for some of the skeptics here.  I'd suggest the following revision to the second and third sentences:
 
::Looks like a good start, Tom, but from the comments so far it seems like nothing short of the full set of observations is going to be satisfactory for some of the skeptics here.  I'd suggest the following revision to the second and third sentences:
 
::''We were wondering if you would oblige us by sending the relevant raw data for the full set of  your observations for this population.  We are intensely curious about the period in which the bacteria population developed the ability to utilize citrase, but would like the complete set of observations instead of a subset to facilitate an independent analysis of the research.''  --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 00:07, 16 June 2008 (EDT)
 
::''We were wondering if you would oblige us by sending the relevant raw data for the full set of  your observations for this population.  We are intensely curious about the period in which the bacteria population developed the ability to utilize citrase, but would like the complete set of observations instead of a subset to facilitate an independent analysis of the research.''  --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 00:07, 16 June 2008 (EDT)
 +
:::It doesn't seem reasonable to demand twenty years' worth of observations, which would be the full set.  Or at least, it doesn't seem reasonable to me.--[[user:TomMoore|<font color="#000066" >Tom Moore</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:TomMoore|fiat justitia ruat coelum]]</sup> 00:09, 16 June 2008 (EDT)
789

edits