Changes

== Recap ==

== Recap ==

Carafe, TomMoore, DinsdaleP and SMaines all defend the withholding from public scrutiny of data underlying a scientific claim.  Moreover, note how insulting some of them have become in response below to a request for public scrutiny of the data.  No more insults will be allowed here, and their talk pollution may be removed.

Carafe, TomMoore, and SMaines all defend the withholding from public scrutiny of data underlying a scientific claim.  Moreover, note how insulting some of them have become in response below to a request for public scrutiny of the data.  No more insults will be allowed here, and their talk pollution may be removed.

Public scrutiny has obvious benefits, and none of them have given any reason for denying that scrutiny.  Journals and even government policy encourage or require it.  Ah, but [[evolutionists]] feel they can play by their own rules, and make public claims without making the data public.  Rest assured that no one here is fooled by this "make the claim but hide the data from the public" approach.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 11:23, 15 June 2008 (EDT)

Public scrutiny has obvious benefits, and none of them have given any reason for denying that scrutiny.  Journals and even government policy encourage or require it.  Ah, but [[evolutionists]] feel they can play by their own rules, and make public claims without making the data public.  Rest assured that no one here is fooled by this "make the claim but hide the data from the public" approach.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 11:23, 15 June 2008 (EDT)