1,971
edits
Changes
Conservapedia:AFD Major bias in conservapedia (view source)
Revision as of 14:08, March 19, 2007
, 14:08, March 19, 2007New page: ==Major bias in conservapedia== Being self-aware of a site's problems can be useful... Examples at Wikipedia include [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_is_failing Wikip...
==[[Major bias in conservapedia]]==
Being self-aware of a site's problems can be useful... Examples at Wikipedia include [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_is_failing Wikipedia:Wikipedia is failing] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Problems_with_Wikipedia Wikipedia:Problems with Wikipedia]. However, those stuck around because they offer some constructive criticism, and are written as a cohesive summary by very experienced users who understand some of Wikipedia's broader, more subtle problems.
This page, however, is likely to become a drive-by troll magnet for people who are new to the site. Moreover, most locked pages have an unlocked talk page where specific concerns can be addressed, and, failing that, [[User talk:Aschlafly]] seems to be a popular place to list complaints. --[[User:Interiot|Interiot]] 10:08, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
Being self-aware of a site's problems can be useful... Examples at Wikipedia include [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_is_failing Wikipedia:Wikipedia is failing] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Problems_with_Wikipedia Wikipedia:Problems with Wikipedia]. However, those stuck around because they offer some constructive criticism, and are written as a cohesive summary by very experienced users who understand some of Wikipedia's broader, more subtle problems.
This page, however, is likely to become a drive-by troll magnet for people who are new to the site. Moreover, most locked pages have an unlocked talk page where specific concerns can be addressed, and, failing that, [[User talk:Aschlafly]] seems to be a popular place to list complaints. --[[User:Interiot|Interiot]] 10:08, 19 March 2007 (EDT)