1
edit
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 981:
Line 981: + + + + +
Conservapedia talk:Lenski dialog (view source)
Revision as of 03:48, June 25, 2008
, 03:48, June 25, 2008Liberal secularist heretic response
::So, once again, the scientists has made assertions without giving adequate explanation. Everything is either assumed to have been "already explained" or is embargoed information (so he and has colleagues can take credit). If I may use a Jewish expression, God forbid he should every give us a straight answer! --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 18:48, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
::So, once again, the scientists has made assertions without giving adequate explanation. Everything is either assumed to have been "already explained" or is embargoed information (so he and has colleagues can take credit). If I may use a Jewish expression, God forbid he should every give us a straight answer! --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 18:48, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
:::Not "speculating", Ed; '''observing'''. The speculation lies in the assumption that what someone you trust, who was told by someone they trust who was told by someone ''they'' trusted - and so on throughout many generations and translations - told ''you'' is an objective fact, and that ''somewhere'' down the line, not a single person - most of whose names you will never know - either made an error in judgment about who to trust, mistranslated, took artistic license at filling in the blanks, or at the very least had unwittingly consumed some rather questionable mushrooms. This is precisely why empirical data is valued in science over anecdotal.
:::You say God said so, I say bring him here to tell me in person. You say God doesn't work that way, I say my how convenient for you, now leave me alone, I'm busy doing science. [[User:Cantle|Cantle]] 23:48, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
==Fair Warning==
==Fair Warning==