282
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 37:
Line 37: + +
→You can wait
:No, I wasn't referring to an unwritten rule; what I was referring to was an attempt by you to make changes that he told you not to do, and those changes would be done behind his back. It's not going to happen. So, wait until he gets back online, broach the question again, and see what comes of it. If he says no, accept it and move on. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 15:14, 26 June 2008 (EDT)
:No, I wasn't referring to an unwritten rule; what I was referring to was an attempt by you to make changes that he told you not to do, and those changes would be done behind his back. It's not going to happen. So, wait until he gets back online, broach the question again, and see what comes of it. If he says no, accept it and move on. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 15:14, 26 June 2008 (EDT)
::Andy has been online several limes since I asked him the question more than 48 hours ago. He has been online several times since I reminded him about it 24 hours ago. If he actually answered me and explained the reasons why my edits were bad I would be happy - it is his site after all. For that matter '''not one other editor''' has ventured to give me a reason why my edits were considered bad, including the several sysops who have been involved in this and (I would hope) have a pretty good idea of how Conservapedia works by now. [[User:Daphnea|Daphnea]] 15:20, 26 June 2008 (EDT)