282
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 673:
Line 673: + +
→Nixon, Libby, and Enron
::I think Nixon's deceit was significant and prolonged. Libby was significant simply for being a high-profile person, and his deceit was prolonged. And Enron's deceit was very significant, costing hundreds of people their savings. All three had their deceit proven in one way or another. It's pretty deceitful to claim otherwise. [[User:ZTak|ZTak]] 13:03, 27 June 2008 (EDT)
::I think Nixon's deceit was significant and prolonged. Libby was significant simply for being a high-profile person, and his deceit was prolonged. And Enron's deceit was very significant, costing hundreds of people their savings. All three had their deceit proven in one way or another. It's pretty deceitful to claim otherwise. [[User:ZTak|ZTak]] 13:03, 27 June 2008 (EDT)
:...is it because they're not liberal...? [[User:Feebasfactor|Feebasfactor]] 13:06, 27 June 2008 (EDT)
:...is it because they're not liberal...? [[User:Feebasfactor|Feebasfactor]] 13:06, 27 June 2008 (EDT)
:I was about to post here yesterday, but I had just added the entires in question back and [[User:Bugler]] blocked me for it. The answer is that yes, of course, you will find as you continue to edit this 'encyclopedia' that examples of conservative deceit are not allowed. [[User:Daphnea|Daphnea]] 19:42, 29 June 2008 (EDT)
==Public school deceit==
==Public school deceit==
It's not a required course, but in "Journalism" students were taught about the evils of slander, deceit, and malice. <sub>your apathetic neighborhood public schooler</sub> [[User:NathanG|Nate]] 16:43, 27 June 2008 (EDT)
It's not a required course, but in "Journalism" students were taught about the evils of slander, deceit, and malice. <sub>your apathetic neighborhood public schooler</sub> [[User:NathanG|Nate]] 16:43, 27 June 2008 (EDT)