1,660
edits
Changes
Debate:What exactly is Conservapedia? (view source)
Revision as of 17:53, March 19, 2007
, 17:53, March 19, 2007no edit summary
Thanks for creating this as a separate article...I think that will be useful.
Thanks for creating this as a separate article...I think that will be useful.
In response to Mr. Schlafly, I would say that having more, complex rules, as you say Wikipedia does, should help, rather than hurt, as that is what this site seems to need. The Commandments are vague and confusing, leading to arbitrariness.
In response to Mr. Schlafly, I would say that having more, complex rules, as you say Wikipedia does, should help, rather than hurt, as that is what this site seems to need. The Commandments are vague and confusing, leading to arbitrariness.
Another interesting point inherent in the wiki process is this--if someone is "patrolling an agenda", their influence will eventually be diluted out. As thousands of users begin to contribute, "mainstream" voices will predominate, and only an enormous army of sysops/admis will be able to maintain a particular character. If the site attracts mainly conservatives, then there will likely be a bit of a conservative bias, but not more than that.
[[User:Palmd001|Palmd001]] 13:40, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
[[User:Palmd001|Palmd001]] 13:40, 19 March 2007 (EDT)