Changes

Talk:Richard Lenski (view source)

Revision as of 17:12, June 30, 2008

517 bytes added , 17:12, June 30, 2008

→‎Formatting: I agree that it is necessary to establish exactly what is being asked for in the terse comments on the right hand side

Line 7: Line 7:

:::I agree. A discussion specifying what one expects from the 'missing' data and what usefulness such information would likely shed is necessary.--[[User:Argon|Argon]] 12:57, 30 June 2008 (EDT)

+

::::I agree that it is necessary to establish exactly what is being asked for in the terse comments on the right hand side, sadly such a discussion could get the majority of the contributors banned for the 90/10 rule. I myself have not contributed much to this question recently as a result of this rule. Could the powers that be explicitly suspend this rule on this issue so that the question may be freely discussed? --[[User:British_cons|British_cons]] [[User_talk:British_cons|(talk)]] 13:12, 30 June 2008 (EDT)

== Listing fields ==

British cons

444

edits