Changes

::The oldest paper there is from generation 20,000.[[User:JPohl|JPohl]] 14:20, 3 July 2008 (EDT)

::The oldest paper there is from generation 20,000.[[User:JPohl|JPohl]] 14:20, 3 July 2008 (EDT)

::''Most of the dates on those cites are years ago'' Well, yes.  The experiment has been running for two decades, has it not?  Of course most of the related data is going to be years old.

::''Most of the dates on those cites are years ago'' Well, yes.  The experiment has been running for two decades, has it not?  Of course most of the related data is going to be years old.--[[User:Jimbb2004|Jimbb2004]] 22:45, 4 July 2008 (EDT)

There is no contradiction in "obtaining or admission of non-existence". If a piece of data is essential for a conclusion and yet does not exist then that non-existence provides bad faith on the part of the person reaching (and publishing) the conclusion.

There is no contradiction in "obtaining or admission of non-existence". If a piece of data is essential for a conclusion and yet does not exist then that non-existence provides bad faith on the part of the person reaching (and publishing) the conclusion.