201
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 7:
Line 7: + − + Line 33:
Line 34: + +
Comment, and fixed my repeated mistyping of my name. Freud would be proud.
I note that X is also missing. This should be a priority I feel, as this could be a valuable source of information with integrity for vulnerable youth looking for answers. --[[User:stevendavy|stevendavy]] 16:23, 21 April 2007 (EDT)
I note that X is also missing. This should be a priority I feel, as this could be a valuable source of information with integrity for vulnerable youth looking for answers. --[[User:stevendavy|stevendavy]] 16:23, 21 April 2007 (EDT)
: Where did "X" come from? I wrote penis, which is surely not going to warp anyones mind. We need to write about the penis and the vagina. There is nothing crude in these things.[[User:stevendavy|stevendavy]] (EDT)
: Where did "X" come from? I wrote penis, which is surely not going to warp anyones mind. We need to write about the penis and the vagina. There is nothing crude in these things.[[User:stevendavy|stevendavy]] (EDT)
:: Exercise caution. I was banned from editing for a week after I used a different clinical termm which I shall not repeat here - and that was on a debate page, where the rules should be more permissive. - [[User:NewCrusader|NewCrusader]]
I notice there is a distinct lack of reproductive organs in this wiki. I don't understand, surely conservatives can describe them in a clinical, objective manner without exploding with passion? There are conservative gynecologists, aren't there? --[[User:Afi|Afi]] 18:22, 17 July 2007 (EDT)
I notice there is a distinct lack of reproductive organs in this wiki. I don't understand, surely conservatives can describe them in a clinical, objective manner without exploding with passion? There are conservative gynecologists, aren't there? --[[User:Afi|Afi]] 18:22, 17 July 2007 (EDT)
::No, we can't. Not in public. It's not our place to put even the most clinical description of sexual subjects in places where minors may see them. Conservapedia can remain silent, and the parents can fend off any curiosity with stories of the stork until they judge their offspring mature enough to handle anything more than 'mummy plus daddy makes baby.' - [[User:NewConservative|NewConservative]]
::No, we can't. Not in public. It's not our place to put even the most clinical description of sexual subjects in places where minors may see them. Conservapedia can remain silent, and the parents can fend off any curiosity with stories of the stork until they judge their offspring mature enough to handle anything more than 'mummy plus daddy makes baby.' - [[User:NewCrusader|NewCrusader]]
Dont be disgusting, I dont want my child going on the internet and reading smut and filth! Conservapedia needs to be kept clean. This article is completely unnecceassary and should be removed. Anyone suggesting "penis" is not a rude word has obviously been going to michael moore school of family values. [[warmonkey]] Jan 11 2008
Dont be disgusting, I dont want my child going on the internet and reading smut and filth! Conservapedia needs to be kept clean. This article is completely unnecceassary and should be removed. Anyone suggesting "penis" is not a rude word has obviously been going to michael moore school of family values. [[warmonkey]] Jan 11 2008
Shouldn't this go in the [[Family]] article? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 22:13, 17 March 2008 (EDT)
Shouldn't this go in the [[Family]] article? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 22:13, 17 March 2008 (EDT)
:The article is on human reproduction. It seems appropriate to explain where the proper and right place for human reproduction is: In marriage, and nowhere else. - [[User:NewCrusader|NewCrusader]]
==Having children==
==Having children==